such a beautiful coincidence, i am learnng robert mapplethorpe now.
my Q: who has the ticket to photograph the nudes of black?
lecturer's answer: depending on the mutual-acceptance between the photographer and the subject.
we know there is power everywhere, it is crucial we could be critical to stand behind and look into the hierarchy. of course his works have aesthetic value, however why most of them are ideal type of body representation in the black. is that a stereotyping of the black. how a WHITE guy like him exploring the beauty of the nudes?
the controversial part of his work, perhaps apart from the deviant sexual perference, is his OWN sexual desire toward the object/subject.
personally i like his works on portraits and SM more than the book of black. of coz it is just very personal.
those portraits have their aura, there are spaces behind and in front of the subject. the spatial time is somehow very surreal to me. the emotion and energy just like phosporescence, it's freezing. it is 4-dimentional.
*** *** ***
well, honestly tell me, do u want hugh cock like a baby arm?
or like a baby being feed by plump tits?
our life begins with sex, and always being with it. it is colorless. and transparent.
沒有留言:
張貼留言